https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173757 A broadly worded appellate provision under the Delhi Rent Control Act was construed to cover only orders affecting the rights or liabilities of the parties. Purely procedural interlocutory orders made during a pending proceeding, including steps such as discovery, inspection, commissions, summoning of witnesses, or similar aids to hearing, do not by themselves create independent appealability. Refusal to issue a commission for inspection and preparation of a plan was treated as a procedural step assisting the parties' case and not as an order determining any substantive right. Accordingly, no appeal lay from the Controller's order, and the appeal was not maintainable. en-us Mon, 12 Sep 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Sep 2015 12:02:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173757 A broadly worded appellate provision under the Delhi Rent Control Act was construed to cover only orders affecting the rights or liabilities of the parties. Purely procedural interlocutory orders made during a pending proceeding, including steps such as discovery, inspection, commissions, summoning of witnesses, or similar aids to hearing, do not by themselves create independent appealability. Refusal to issue a commission for inspection and preparation of a plan was treated as a procedural step assisting the parties' case and not as an order determining any substantive right. Accordingly, no appeal lay from the Controller's order, and the appeal was not maintainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 12 Sep 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173757