https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173756 The Supreme Court held that the High Court lacked jurisdiction to grant bail directly under POTA without the accused applying to the Special Court first. The Court emphasized that the provisions of POTA excluded the High Court's power under Section 439 Cr.P.C. and required adherence to the specific procedural requirements of POTA. The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's bail order, directing the accused to seek bail from the Special Court as per Section 34 of POTA, highlighting the importance of following statutory procedures in special statutes like POTA. en-us Mon, 08 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Dec 2015 22:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173756 The Supreme Court held that the High Court lacked jurisdiction to grant bail directly under POTA without the accused applying to the Special Court first. The Court emphasized that the provisions of POTA excluded the High Court's power under Section 439 Cr.P.C. and required adherence to the specific procedural requirements of POTA. The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's bail order, directing the accused to seek bail from the Special Court as per Section 34 of POTA, highlighting the importance of following statutory procedures in special statutes like POTA. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 08 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173756