https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173755 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision in a case concerning the interpretation of the term 'business' in the Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960. The Court ruled that the practice of law constitutes 'business' under Section 10(3)(a)(iii) of the Act, allowing eviction for the landlord's business purposes in non-residential buildings. The appellant's argument for a narrow interpretation of 'business' was rejected, emphasizing a broad construction to include professions like law. Previous cases and judgments supported this interpretation, ensuring no discrimination against liberal professions. en-us Mon, 05 Feb 1979 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Sep 2015 11:47:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173755 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision in a case concerning the interpretation of the term 'business' in the Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960. The Court ruled that the practice of law constitutes 'business' under Section 10(3)(a)(iii) of the Act, allowing eviction for the landlord's business purposes in non-residential buildings. The appellant's argument for a narrow interpretation of 'business' was rejected, emphasizing a broad construction to include professions like law. Previous cases and judgments supported this interpretation, ensuring no discrimination against liberal professions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 05 Feb 1979 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173755