<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (2) TMI 666 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173753</link>
    <description>Civil appeals were dismissed because a 288-day delay was not satisfactorily explained, and no sufficient cause was shown for condonation. The Court therefore declined to entertain the appeals and brought the proceedings to an end on the ground of delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 11:27:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (2) TMI 666 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173753</link>
      <description>Civil appeals were dismissed because a 288-day delay was not satisfactorily explained, and no sufficient cause was shown for condonation. The Court therefore declined to entertain the appeals and brought the proceedings to an end on the ground of delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173753</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>