<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 961 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173750</link>
    <description>After transfer of a criminal case to another State, the power to appoint the Public Prosecutor or Special Public Prosecutor under Section 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure vests in the State controlling the court where the trial is actually pending, unless the transfer order provides otherwise. The transferor State therefore loses appointment authority over that prosecution in the transferee court. The material also notes that, despite the transferee State&#039;s appointment power, the prosecution expenses and advocate&#039;s fee for the transferred sessions case were directed to be borne by the transferor State, with inter-governmental consultation for implementation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2015 09:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398258" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 961 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173750</link>
      <description>After transfer of a criminal case to another State, the power to appoint the Public Prosecutor or Special Public Prosecutor under Section 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure vests in the State controlling the court where the trial is actually pending, unless the transfer order provides otherwise. The transferor State therefore loses appointment authority over that prosecution in the transferee court. The material also notes that, despite the transferee State&#039;s appointment power, the prosecution expenses and advocate&#039;s fee for the transferred sessions case were directed to be borne by the transferor State, with inter-governmental consultation for implementation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173750</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>