https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173750 The Supreme Court held that the State of Tamil Nadu lacked authority to appoint Public Prosecutors for a case transferred to Pondicherry. It was determined that the State of Pondicherry had the jurisdiction to appoint Public Prosecutors for the transferred case as per Section 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Court set aside the High Court's order, directing the State of Pondicherry to appoint the Public Prosecutor for the case, with expenses to be borne by Tamil Nadu, ensuring a fair trial and proper prosecution under Pondicherry's jurisdiction. en-us Tue, 22 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Nov 2015 09:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173750 The Supreme Court held that the State of Tamil Nadu lacked authority to appoint Public Prosecutors for a case transferred to Pondicherry. It was determined that the State of Pondicherry had the jurisdiction to appoint Public Prosecutors for the transferred case as per Section 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Court set aside the High Court's order, directing the State of Pondicherry to appoint the Public Prosecutor for the case, with expenses to be borne by Tamil Nadu, ensuring a fair trial and proper prosecution under Pondicherry's jurisdiction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 22 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173750