https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173745 Under section 3(4)(b) of the Madras (now Tamil Nadu) Cultivating Tenants Protection Act, the authority must first determine arrears and then grant just and reasonable time for payment after considering the parties' relative circumstances. Eviction is not to be ordered simultaneously as a conditional consequence of future default; it can arise only after the time allowed has expired, the tenant has failed to deposit, and a fresh adjudication shows wilful or contumacious default. The majority treated the fixing of time as a statutory judicial act and held that a composite eviction order curtailed the Act's protective scheme. The eviction orders were therefore without jurisdiction and were set aside. en-us Thu, 10 Dec 1981 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Sep 2015 10:41:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173745 Under section 3(4)(b) of the Madras (now Tamil Nadu) Cultivating Tenants Protection Act, the authority must first determine arrears and then grant just and reasonable time for payment after considering the parties' relative circumstances. Eviction is not to be ordered simultaneously as a conditional consequence of future default; it can arise only after the time allowed has expired, the tenant has failed to deposit, and a fresh adjudication shows wilful or contumacious default. The majority treated the fixing of time as a statutory judicial act and held that a composite eviction order curtailed the Act's protective scheme. The eviction orders were therefore without jurisdiction and were set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 10 Dec 1981 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173745