<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (2) TMI 510 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173737</link>
    <description>Section 36(1) of the Gujarat Cooperative Societies Act makes expulsion of a member effective only after the resolution is submitted to the Registrar and the Registrar communicates approval or disapproval within three months. The time limit is a mandatory fetter on the Registrar&#039;s authority, not a mere directory requirement. Once three months expire without communication, the Registrar&#039;s power to act lapses, the Registrar becomes functus officio, and the resolution takes effect by operation of law. The Supreme Court therefore held that a later disapproval was without jurisdiction and the challenge to the Registrar&#039;s order succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 10:11:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (2) TMI 510 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173737</link>
      <description>Section 36(1) of the Gujarat Cooperative Societies Act makes expulsion of a member effective only after the resolution is submitted to the Registrar and the Registrar communicates approval or disapproval within three months. The time limit is a mandatory fetter on the Registrar&#039;s authority, not a mere directory requirement. Once three months expire without communication, the Registrar&#039;s power to act lapses, the Registrar becomes functus officio, and the resolution takes effect by operation of law. The Supreme Court therefore held that a later disapproval was without jurisdiction and the challenge to the Registrar&#039;s order succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173737</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>