https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264323 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the decision holding them liable for service tax under the "Interior decorator" category. The Tribunal found that the appellant's activities, including carpentry work and modular partitions, aligned more with "Erection, Commissioning, or Installation Services" rather than "Interior Decorator services." The judgment clarified that the appellant's services did not fall under the definition of "Interior Decorator" as per the Finance Act, allowing the appeal and providing consequential relief to the appellant. en-us Tue, 11 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Feb 2016 11:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264323 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the decision holding them liable for service tax under the "Interior decorator" category. The Tribunal found that the appellant's activities, including carpentry work and modular partitions, aligned more with "Erection, Commissioning, or Installation Services" rather than "Interior Decorator services." The judgment clarified that the appellant's services did not fall under the definition of "Interior Decorator" as per the Finance Act, allowing the appeal and providing consequential relief to the appellant. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 11 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264323