<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 989 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264321</link>
    <description>The tribunal granted a stay application against an Order-in-Original confirming demands and penalties under various sections of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellants successfully argued against the confirmation of demands related to Erection, Commissioning, and Installation Services by pointing out discrepancies in contract scrutiny and taxability of composite contracts. They also contested tax liability for Sales Promotion and Marketing Services, Intellectual Property Rights Services, and Management, Maintenance, and Repair Services, leading to the waiver of pre-deposit and stay on recovery of adjudicated liabilities. The judgment highlighted the importance of thorough contract scrutiny and consideration of taxability timelines in determining tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 06:57:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398228" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 989 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264321</link>
      <description>The tribunal granted a stay application against an Order-in-Original confirming demands and penalties under various sections of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellants successfully argued against the confirmation of demands related to Erection, Commissioning, and Installation Services by pointing out discrepancies in contract scrutiny and taxability of composite contracts. They also contested tax liability for Sales Promotion and Marketing Services, Intellectual Property Rights Services, and Management, Maintenance, and Repair Services, leading to the waiver of pre-deposit and stay on recovery of adjudicated liabilities. The judgment highlighted the importance of thorough contract scrutiny and consideration of taxability timelines in determining tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264321</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>