<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 986 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264318</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the Civil Miscellaneous Appeals, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision directing a pre-deposit of Rs. 45 lakhs within eight weeks. The Court found the appellant&#039;s argument of financial hardship lacking sufficient evidence beyond a general statement, leading to the rejection of the request for interference with the Tribunal&#039;s order. Compliance with the pre-deposit was extended by eight weeks, with the connected matters closed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2015 15:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 986 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264318</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the Civil Miscellaneous Appeals, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision directing a pre-deposit of Rs. 45 lakhs within eight weeks. The Court found the appellant&#039;s argument of financial hardship lacking sufficient evidence beyond a general statement, leading to the rejection of the request for interference with the Tribunal&#039;s order. Compliance with the pre-deposit was extended by eight weeks, with the connected matters closed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>