<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 983 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264315</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the revenue&#039;s classification of imported goods under Chapter 39 instead of Chapter 38 due to the repacking process not constituting manufacturing. The appellant was directed to reverse Cenvat credit and repay the differential duty amount. The extended limitation period was justified, and penalties on employees involved in misclassification were reduced. The tribunal dismissed the relevance of cited case laws, emphasizing accurate classification and adherence to regulatory procedures. Appeals were dismissed with modified penalties, highlighting the significance of compliance to prevent misstatements and penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2016 17:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 983 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264315</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the revenue&#039;s classification of imported goods under Chapter 39 instead of Chapter 38 due to the repacking process not constituting manufacturing. The appellant was directed to reverse Cenvat credit and repay the differential duty amount. The extended limitation period was justified, and penalties on employees involved in misclassification were reduced. The tribunal dismissed the relevance of cited case laws, emphasizing accurate classification and adherence to regulatory procedures. Appeals were dismissed with modified penalties, highlighting the significance of compliance to prevent misstatements and penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264315</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>