<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 981 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264313</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that quantity/turnover discounts should not be included in the assessable value. Additionally, it was determined that there was no unjust enrichment in the refund of duty based on cash discounts, as the discounts were passed on through credit notes, and the Department failed to prove their inauthenticity. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the acceptability of differential discounts to unrelated buyers based on commercial considerations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 06:56:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 981 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264313</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that quantity/turnover discounts should not be included in the assessable value. Additionally, it was determined that there was no unjust enrichment in the refund of duty based on cash discounts, as the discounts were passed on through credit notes, and the Department failed to prove their inauthenticity. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the acceptability of differential discounts to unrelated buyers based on commercial considerations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264313</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>