<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 975 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264307</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the imposition of an enhanced penalty by the adjudicating authority under the Customs Act in a case involving confiscated imported printing machines. The Court affirmed the authority&#039;s discretion to determine penalties in de-novo proceedings, irrespective of previous orders, emphasizing the authority&#039;s power to decide on penalties as deemed appropriate upon complete remand for re-adjudication. The appellant&#039;s challenge against the penalty imposition was dismissed, with the High Court supporting the enhanced penalty decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2016 11:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398214" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 975 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264307</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the imposition of an enhanced penalty by the adjudicating authority under the Customs Act in a case involving confiscated imported printing machines. The Court affirmed the authority&#039;s discretion to determine penalties in de-novo proceedings, irrespective of previous orders, emphasizing the authority&#039;s power to decide on penalties as deemed appropriate upon complete remand for re-adjudication. The appellant&#039;s challenge against the penalty imposition was dismissed, with the High Court supporting the enhanced penalty decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264307</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>