<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 946 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264278</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. The appellant&#039;s acceptance of debit notes as reimbursable expenses or bad debts, coupled with compliance with accounting conditions, justified the deletion of the disallowed amount. The decision aligned with TRF Ltd. principles, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s forced expenditure acceptance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 06:54:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398185" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 946 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264278</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. The appellant&#039;s acceptance of debit notes as reimbursable expenses or bad debts, coupled with compliance with accounting conditions, justified the deletion of the disallowed amount. The decision aligned with TRF Ltd. principles, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s forced expenditure acceptance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264278</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>