<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 1069 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173734</link>
    <description>A manufacturer availing exemption under Notification No. 1/93-C.E. could continue to claim deemed credit after clearances crossed Rs. 75 lakhs and up to Rs. 2 crores, because an earlier Division Bench ruling had already held that excess duty payment within the prescribed limits entitled the assessee to such benefit. The court followed that binding view and held that documentary production was not required as a condition for availing deemed credit. The reference was answered in favour of the assessee on the stated facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 May 2017 10:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398179" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 1069 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173734</link>
      <description>A manufacturer availing exemption under Notification No. 1/93-C.E. could continue to claim deemed credit after clearances crossed Rs. 75 lakhs and up to Rs. 2 crores, because an earlier Division Bench ruling had already held that excess duty payment within the prescribed limits entitled the assessee to such benefit. The court followed that binding view and held that documentary production was not required as a condition for availing deemed credit. The reference was answered in favour of the assessee on the stated facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>