<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 601 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173724</link>
    <description>Under Section 37 of the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966, the State Government may sanction a proposed modification with or without changes and on conditions it deems fit, so it was competent to add words restricting TDR use to the same plot while granting approval. The provision did not require a fresh public notice or hearing at the sanction stage, and the earlier view denying that power was unsustainable. The Court also held that review could not be based on a later understanding of the Corporation&#039;s practice, because there was no error apparent on the record and there can be no estoppel against statutory rules. The review petitions therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2015 09:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398167" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 601 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173724</link>
      <description>Under Section 37 of the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966, the State Government may sanction a proposed modification with or without changes and on conditions it deems fit, so it was competent to add words restricting TDR use to the same plot while granting approval. The provision did not require a fresh public notice or hearing at the sanction stage, and the earlier view denying that power was unsustainable. The Court also held that review could not be based on a later understanding of the Corporation&#039;s practice, because there was no error apparent on the record and there can be no estoppel against statutory rules. The review petitions therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173724</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>