<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Pre-deposit of penalty required only if challenging penalty order; composite orders cause undue hardship otherwise.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=24847</link>
    <description>Pre-deposit of the penalty amount would be required only when the order of the penalty alone is under challenge. But when there is composite order namely assessment order of the tax component along with interest and also penalty as in the present case, direction for pre-deposit of any portion of the penalty amount would result in injustice as well as hardship. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 16:39:12 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 16:39:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398156" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Pre-deposit of penalty required only if challenging penalty order; composite orders cause undue hardship otherwise.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=24847</link>
      <description>Pre-deposit of the penalty amount would be required only when the order of the penalty alone is under challenge. But when there is composite order namely assessment order of the tax component along with interest and also penalty as in the present case, direction for pre-deposit of any portion of the penalty amount would result in injustice as well as hardship. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 16:39:12 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=24847</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>