<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (5) TMI 1066 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173716</link>
    <description>Charand land is treated as shamilat-deh under the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulations) Act, 1961, and therefore vests in the Gram Panchayat. The Court accepted the settled view that charand is not distinct from shamilat-deh for vesting purposes, and rejected the challenge to vesting. It also held that Rule 3(2) of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulations) Rules, 1964 permits the Panchayat to use or lease vested land for authorised purposes, including grazing and cultivation. On the facts, the challenge to the lease and use of the land was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 16:28:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398153" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (5) TMI 1066 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173716</link>
      <description>Charand land is treated as shamilat-deh under the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulations) Act, 1961, and therefore vests in the Gram Panchayat. The Court accepted the settled view that charand is not distinct from shamilat-deh for vesting purposes, and rejected the challenge to vesting. It also held that Rule 3(2) of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulations) Rules, 1964 permits the Panchayat to use or lease vested land for authorised purposes, including grazing and cultivation. On the facts, the challenge to the lease and use of the land was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173716</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>