<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (8) TMI 524 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173708</link>
    <description>Enhanced solatium and interest under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 were held unavailable once compensation proceedings had attained finality, because the court had no jurisdiction to reopen concluded matters by review or ancillary powers. The prohibition on review for a mere change in law did not assist where the statute did not permit the relief. A prior dismissal of a special leave petition in limine, without adjudication on merits, did not operate as res judicata and did not bar the later challenge. The original compensation terms were therefore restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 15:05:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398140" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (8) TMI 524 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173708</link>
      <description>Enhanced solatium and interest under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 were held unavailable once compensation proceedings had attained finality, because the court had no jurisdiction to reopen concluded matters by review or ancillary powers. The prohibition on review for a mere change in law did not assist where the statute did not permit the relief. A prior dismissal of a special leave petition in limine, without adjudication on merits, did not operate as res judicata and did not bar the later challenge. The original compensation terms were therefore restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>