<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 540 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173707</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Bombay Animal Preservation (Gujarat Amendment) Act, 1994, declaring it intra vires the Constitution. The amendments imposing a total ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks were deemed valid, emphasizing the public interest in preserving cow progeny. The Court clarified the relationship between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles, highlighting the importance of legislative intent and the evolving interpretation of restrictions under Article 19(1)(g). The decision underscored the significance of preserving cattle breeds and supporting the agricultural economy, dismissing challenges to the Act and affirming the prohibition on cow progeny slaughter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2015 21:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 540 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173707</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Bombay Animal Preservation (Gujarat Amendment) Act, 1994, declaring it intra vires the Constitution. The amendments imposing a total ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks were deemed valid, emphasizing the public interest in preserving cow progeny. The Court clarified the relationship between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles, highlighting the importance of legislative intent and the evolving interpretation of restrictions under Article 19(1)(g). The decision underscored the significance of preserving cattle breeds and supporting the agricultural economy, dismissing challenges to the Act and affirming the prohibition on cow progeny slaughter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>