<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 934 - CESTAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264266</link>
    <description>The Tribunal, after a dissenting opinion, directed the appellant to pay the duty amount of Rs. 16.70 lakhs in cash and deposit Rs. 25 lakhs towards the penalty. The appellant was given eight weeks to comply with the orders. The case underscored the significance of adhering to Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, prohibiting the use of Cenvat credit during default periods and addressing the repercussions of fraudulent activities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2015 11:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398127" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 934 - CESTAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264266</link>
      <description>The Tribunal, after a dissenting opinion, directed the appellant to pay the duty amount of Rs. 16.70 lakhs in cash and deposit Rs. 25 lakhs towards the penalty. The appellant was given eight weeks to comply with the orders. The case underscored the significance of adhering to Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, prohibiting the use of Cenvat credit during default periods and addressing the repercussions of fraudulent activities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264266</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>