<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 928 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264260</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the benefit claimed under Notification No. 96/2008 for importing &quot;Comoros Cloves.&quot; Despite procedural discrepancies in the certificate of origin, the Tribunal found them insufficient to deny the exemption. The Tribunal emphasized a liberal approach in interpreting exemption notifications, directing the lower authorities to assess the bill of entry for clearance of the imported goods in compliance with the notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 15:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 928 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264260</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the benefit claimed under Notification No. 96/2008 for importing &quot;Comoros Cloves.&quot; Despite procedural discrepancies in the certificate of origin, the Tribunal found them insufficient to deny the exemption. The Tribunal emphasized a liberal approach in interpreting exemption notifications, directing the lower authorities to assess the bill of entry for clearance of the imported goods in compliance with the notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264260</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>