<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 927 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264259</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and affirmed the classification of the goods under Tariff Heading 6807.10. The decision was based on the analysis of the goods&#039; composition, interpretation of relevant tariff headings, and the lack of evidence supporting reclassification. The Tribunal emphasized consistent classification principles and upheld its previous decision regarding similar goods, ultimately determining that the goods should be classified under Chapter 68.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 May 2016 12:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 927 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264259</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and affirmed the classification of the goods under Tariff Heading 6807.10. The decision was based on the analysis of the goods&#039; composition, interpretation of relevant tariff headings, and the lack of evidence supporting reclassification. The Tribunal emphasized consistent classification principles and upheld its previous decision regarding similar goods, ultimately determining that the goods should be classified under Chapter 68.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264259</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>