https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173705 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals against the High Court's judgment in Second Appeal Nos. 1601-04/1986, affirming that the defendant had not established adverse possession. Despite the lack of a specific substantial question of law, the Court found no prejudice to the appellant as both parties were aware of the issue and evidence was presented. Emphasizing the avoidance of unnecessary technicalities, the Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision, granting time for the appellants to vacate the premises. en-us Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Nov 2015 21:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173705 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals against the High Court's judgment in Second Appeal Nos. 1601-04/1986, affirming that the defendant had not established adverse possession. Despite the lack of a specific substantial question of law, the Court found no prejudice to the appellant as both parties were aware of the issue and evidence was presented. Emphasizing the avoidance of unnecessary technicalities, the Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision, granting time for the appellants to vacate the premises. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173705