<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 7 - CESTAT, Chennai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned orders, as it concluded that the appellants and the marketing units were not related persons under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The decision emphasized the necessity of concrete evidence and adherence to legal criteria in establishing related person status.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 14:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 7 - CESTAT, Chennai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned orders, as it concluded that the appellants and the marketing units were not related persons under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The decision emphasized the necessity of concrete evidence and adherence to legal criteria in establishing related person status.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>