https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173703 The High Court's writ disposal was unsustainable because it did not examine the challenge to the notifications or the contention that levy of market fee on Zafrani Zarda was unauthorised. The statutory scheme, including the effect of Section 4-A, and its interaction with Sections 3 and 4, raised material questions of law and fact bearing on the validity of the levy and the applicability of the notifications. Those issues should have been addressed in the first instance. The Supreme Court set aside the impugned judgment and remitted the matters to the High Court for fresh disposal. en-us Wed, 14 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Nov 2015 09:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173703 The High Court's writ disposal was unsustainable because it did not examine the challenge to the notifications or the contention that levy of market fee on Zafrani Zarda was unauthorised. The statutory scheme, including the effect of Section 4-A, and its interaction with Sections 3 and 4, raised material questions of law and fact bearing on the validity of the levy and the applicability of the notifications. Those issues should have been addressed in the first instance. The Supreme Court set aside the impugned judgment and remitted the matters to the High Court for fresh disposal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 14 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173703