https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264250 The High Court overturned the Central Administrative Tribunal's decision and deemed the petitioner's repatriation to Chennai unlawful. The court found that the petitioner's transfer to Delhi in 2009 was valid under the existing guidelines, and subsequent clarifications in 2011 and 2012 could not retroactively affect her rights. The court also ruled that the petitioner's period in Delhi was not on deputation basis. The repatriation order was quashed, affirming the petitioner's right to remain in her post in Delhi. en-us Mon, 21 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Sep 2015 14:01:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264250 The High Court overturned the Central Administrative Tribunal's decision and deemed the petitioner's repatriation to Chennai unlawful. The court found that the petitioner's transfer to Delhi in 2009 was valid under the existing guidelines, and subsequent clarifications in 2011 and 2012 could not retroactively affect her rights. The court also ruled that the petitioner's period in Delhi was not on deputation basis. The repatriation order was quashed, affirming the petitioner's right to remain in her post in Delhi. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 21 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264250