<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (11) TMI 163 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173699</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision that the respondent-company was liable to pay royalty at the reduced rate of 5% from December 29, 1961, to December 31, 1965. The State Government&#039;s orders and demand notices were quashed, clarifying the interpretation of Section 30A and the notification to avoid imposing rates higher than 5%.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 13:14:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398100" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (11) TMI 163 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173699</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision that the respondent-company was liable to pay royalty at the reduced rate of 5% from December 29, 1961, to December 31, 1965. The State Government&#039;s orders and demand notices were quashed, clarifying the interpretation of Section 30A and the notification to avoid imposing rates higher than 5%.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173699</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>