<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (7) TMI 80 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173696</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, is comprehensive and applies to establishments with 20 or more employees. Employees excluded by the Act cannot claim bonus under other laws. The Act&#039;s provisions are exhaustive, and disputes are resolved under the Industrial Disputes Act. The legislative intent was to create a statutory obligation for bonus payment. Exemptions under the Act are based on policy considerations. The Court set aside Tribunal orders, ruling in favor of the appeals without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 12:56:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (7) TMI 80 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173696</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, is comprehensive and applies to establishments with 20 or more employees. Employees excluded by the Act cannot claim bonus under other laws. The Act&#039;s provisions are exhaustive, and disputes are resolved under the Industrial Disputes Act. The legislative intent was to create a statutory obligation for bonus payment. Exemptions under the Act are based on policy considerations. The Court set aside Tribunal orders, ruling in favor of the appeals without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>