https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173694 The Supreme Court held that the Chandigarh Administration had the authority to correct a mistake in rent fixation under the Chandigarh Lease-hold of Sites and Buildings Rules, 1973. The Court emphasized that the Administration was rectifying an error and not conducting a review, thus upholding the demand notice for payment of the difference in ground rent. The Court rejected the Society's argument of equitable estoppel and ruled that statutory provisions must be enforced without exceptions. Consequently, the Court allowed the appeal, overturned the High Court's decision, and dismissed the Society's writ petition without costs. en-us Wed, 14 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Sep 2015 12:37:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173694 The Supreme Court held that the Chandigarh Administration had the authority to correct a mistake in rent fixation under the Chandigarh Lease-hold of Sites and Buildings Rules, 1973. The Court emphasized that the Administration was rectifying an error and not conducting a review, thus upholding the demand notice for payment of the difference in ground rent. The Court rejected the Society's argument of equitable estoppel and ruled that statutory provisions must be enforced without exceptions. Consequently, the Court allowed the appeal, overturned the High Court's decision, and dismissed the Society's writ petition without costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 14 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173694