https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173692 The Supreme Court held that the District Forum lacked jurisdiction to entertain a complaint regarding the refusal to award a B.Ed. degree, as educational institutions providing services do not fall under the Consumer Protection Act. The respondent's simultaneous enrollment in two courses was deemed illegitimate, leading to the withholding of the B.Ed. degree. The Notification granting eligibility for delayed completion did not apply to the respondent's case due to violation of enrollment rules. The respondent was not entitled to the degree, and consumer protection laws were found inapplicable. The appeal was allowed, setting aside previous judgments, emphasizing correct implementation of statutory provisions. en-us Mon, 19 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Oct 2015 19:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173692 The Supreme Court held that the District Forum lacked jurisdiction to entertain a complaint regarding the refusal to award a B.Ed. degree, as educational institutions providing services do not fall under the Consumer Protection Act. The respondent's simultaneous enrollment in two courses was deemed illegitimate, leading to the withholding of the B.Ed. degree. The Notification granting eligibility for delayed completion did not apply to the respondent's case due to violation of enrollment rules. The respondent was not entitled to the degree, and consumer protection laws were found inapplicable. The appeal was allowed, setting aside previous judgments, emphasizing correct implementation of statutory provisions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 19 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173692