<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 914 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264246</link>
    <description>The Revenue challenged an order setting aside a notice of demand in a writ appeal. The Judge&#039;s decision to entirely set aside the demand notice and attachment order was deemed excessive. The appeal was allowed, modifying the order to provide limited protection against coercive action until the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal decided on the stay petition within two weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 10:55:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 914 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264246</link>
      <description>The Revenue challenged an order setting aside a notice of demand in a writ appeal. The Judge&#039;s decision to entirely set aside the demand notice and attachment order was deemed excessive. The appeal was allowed, modifying the order to provide limited protection against coercive action until the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal decided on the stay petition within two weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264246</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>