<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 910 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264242</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals of both the AO and the assessee, reducing the final addition to Rs. 50,00,000. The Tribunal acknowledged operational challenges faced by the assessee but found scrap generation and repair costs inadequately justified. The decision aimed to balance the interests of both parties, considering factors like location and transportation difficulties. The order was pronounced on 31st August 2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 17:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398070" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 910 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264242</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals of both the AO and the assessee, reducing the final addition to Rs. 50,00,000. The Tribunal acknowledged operational challenges faced by the assessee but found scrap generation and repair costs inadequately justified. The decision aimed to balance the interests of both parties, considering factors like location and transportation difficulties. The order was pronounced on 31st August 2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>