<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 906 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264238</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT&#039;s order directing the A.O. to re-examine issues of additional depreciation, set off of brought forward capital loss, and disallowance under Section 14A. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal for condonation of delay, emphasizing the need for vigilance in preserving legal rights. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, directing the A.O. to re-examine the issues de novo.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 08:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398066" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 906 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264238</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT&#039;s order directing the A.O. to re-examine issues of additional depreciation, set off of brought forward capital loss, and disallowance under Section 14A. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal for condonation of delay, emphasizing the need for vigilance in preserving legal rights. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, directing the A.O. to re-examine the issues de novo.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264238</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>