<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 898 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264230</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed all three appeals of the Revenue, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all grounds related to capitalization of license fee and royalty expenditure, disallowance of fees held as capital, disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the IT Act, addition under Section 41(1) of the IT Act, and capitalization of brand development expenditure. The order was pronounced on 08th September 2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2016 18:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 898 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264230</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed all three appeals of the Revenue, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all grounds related to capitalization of license fee and royalty expenditure, disallowance of fees held as capital, disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the IT Act, addition under Section 41(1) of the IT Act, and capitalization of brand development expenditure. The order was pronounced on 08th September 2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264230</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>