<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 7 - CESTAT, New Delhi</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order in a valuation dispute concerning Television sets under an exchange scheme. It was determined that the addition of Rs. 2000 per set for old Television sets was appropriate, based on MRP assessments. The Tribunal also clarified that the woofer should be valued separately from the Television set. Confiscation and penalties were deemed unnecessary due to lack of intent to evade duty, resulting in the rejection of appeals and cross-objections, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 14:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39804" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 7 - CESTAT, New Delhi</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order in a valuation dispute concerning Television sets under an exchange scheme. It was determined that the addition of Rs. 2000 per set for old Television sets was appropriate, based on MRP assessments. The Tribunal also clarified that the woofer should be valued separately from the Television set. Confiscation and penalties were deemed unnecessary due to lack of intent to evade duty, resulting in the rejection of appeals and cross-objections, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>