<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 598 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173679</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to allow modvat credit based on documents from an unregistered dealer, emphasizing the importance of substantial benefit and legal precedents supporting such allowances. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, and the order passed by the Additional Commissioner was upheld based on the legal interpretations provided by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2015 18:07:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398039" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 598 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173679</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to allow modvat credit based on documents from an unregistered dealer, emphasizing the importance of substantial benefit and legal precedents supporting such allowances. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, and the order passed by the Additional Commissioner was upheld based on the legal interpretations provided by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173679</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>