<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 513 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173678</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the importance of establishing duty paid inputs for claiming credit of duty under Rule 57G of the Central Excise Rules. The judgment favored the assessee by rejecting the denial of credit based solely on deficiencies in duty paying documents, following the precedent set in Marmagoa Steel Ltd. vs. Union of India 2005 (192) ELT 82 (Bom.).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 12:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398038" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 513 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173678</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the importance of establishing duty paid inputs for claiming credit of duty under Rule 57G of the Central Excise Rules. The judgment favored the assessee by rejecting the denial of credit based solely on deficiencies in duty paying documents, following the precedent set in Marmagoa Steel Ltd. vs. Union of India 2005 (192) ELT 82 (Bom.).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173678</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>