<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 942 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173677</link>
    <description>Supreme Court proceedings show the civil appeal in a Central Excise dispute between the Commissioner and Hindalco Industries was admitted; the provided text contains only docket information and the single operative entry that the appeal was admitted, without any substantive reasoning, legal principles, or operative holdings supplied to summarise further.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2015 17:18:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398037" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 942 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173677</link>
      <description>Supreme Court proceedings show the civil appeal in a Central Excise dispute between the Commissioner and Hindalco Industries was admitted; the provided text contains only docket information and the single operative entry that the appeal was admitted, without any substantive reasoning, legal principles, or operative holdings supplied to summarise further.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173677</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>