<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 645 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173674</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the civil appeal by applying its earlier decision in Civil Appeal No. 5401 of 2007, holding that the present matter was covered by that binding precedent. The Court adopted the ratio of Union of India v. Vicco Laboratories dated 26-11-2007 and found no basis for a contrary view in the appeal. The dismissal was expressly made in conformity with the earlier judgment, so the prior ruling governed the outcome of the present proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2015 17:08:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 645 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173674</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the civil appeal by applying its earlier decision in Civil Appeal No. 5401 of 2007, holding that the present matter was covered by that binding precedent. The Court adopted the ratio of Union of India v. Vicco Laboratories dated 26-11-2007 and found no basis for a contrary view in the appeal. The dismissal was expressly made in conformity with the earlier judgment, so the prior ruling governed the outcome of the present proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173674</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>