<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 11 - CESTAT - Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that insulated tiffin carriers should be classified under heading 39.23 for packing goods, rather than as tableware and kitchenware under heading 39.24. The Commissioner&#039;s classification was overturned, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 14:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39803" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 11 - CESTAT - Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that insulated tiffin carriers should be classified under heading 39.23 for packing goods, rather than as tableware and kitchenware under heading 39.24. The Commissioner&#039;s classification was overturned, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>