https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173668 Concurrent findings of guilt were left undisturbed in revision because no illegality or perversity in the trial court and appellate court's conclusions was shown, so interference with the conviction under the Customs Act was refused. However, the sentence was reduced on equitable grounds because the incident was old and the petitioner had already undergone about 34 days' custody, making further imprisonment unnecessary. The appellate sentence of three months' rigorous imprisonment was therefore brought down to the period already undergone, while the fine remained intact. en-us Tue, 19 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Oct 2015 17:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173668 Concurrent findings of guilt were left undisturbed in revision because no illegality or perversity in the trial court and appellate court's conclusions was shown, so interference with the conviction under the Customs Act was refused. However, the sentence was reduced on equitable grounds because the incident was old and the petitioner had already undergone about 34 days' custody, making further imprisonment unnecessary. The appellate sentence of three months' rigorous imprisonment was therefore brought down to the period already undergone, while the fine remained intact. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 19 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173668