<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 1125 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173668</link>
    <description>The High Court partly allowed the revision petition, maintaining the conviction under Section 135(1)(ii) of the Custom Act but reducing the sentence to the period already served by the petitioner, which amounted to 34 days of rigorous imprisonment. The fine imposed by the trial court and upheld by the appellate court remained unchanged. The petitioner, who was on bail, was not required to surrender, and his bail bonds were discharged.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2015 17:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398027" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 1125 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173668</link>
      <description>The High Court partly allowed the revision petition, maintaining the conviction under Section 135(1)(ii) of the Custom Act but reducing the sentence to the period already served by the petitioner, which amounted to 34 days of rigorous imprisonment. The fine imposed by the trial court and upheld by the appellate court remained unchanged. The petitioner, who was on bail, was not required to surrender, and his bail bonds were discharged.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>