<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 911 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173660</link>
    <description>Separate stock accounts and route cards did not by themselves displace estimated first sales turnover where the physical stock was intermixed and lacked identification marks to distinguish local, inter-State, import, taxable and non-taxable goods; the Tribunal&#039;s reduced estimation was therefore upheld. Penalty, however, could not be sustained merely because turnover was estimated, as there was no finding of concealment or other penal conduct. The assessment on estimated turnover was maintained, but the penalty was deleted. The governing principle is that turnover estimation may stand where stock identification fails, while penalty requires proof beyond mere estimation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2016 23:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398019" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 911 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173660</link>
      <description>Separate stock accounts and route cards did not by themselves displace estimated first sales turnover where the physical stock was intermixed and lacked identification marks to distinguish local, inter-State, import, taxable and non-taxable goods; the Tribunal&#039;s reduced estimation was therefore upheld. Penalty, however, could not be sustained merely because turnover was estimated, as there was no finding of concealment or other penal conduct. The assessment on estimated turnover was maintained, but the penalty was deleted. The governing principle is that turnover estimation may stand where stock identification fails, while penalty requires proof beyond mere estimation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173660</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>