https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173659 The Supreme Court determined that the defendants were purchasers of the goods and not agents for sale, overturning the High Court's decision. Additionally, the Court found that the accounts between the parties were settled and could not be reopened due to lack of evidence of fraud, mistake, or equitable grounds. Consequently, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's judgment, and reinstated the trial court's decision in favor of the defendants, who were awarded costs in both courts. en-us Tue, 22 Mar 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Sep 2015 14:17:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173659 The Supreme Court determined that the defendants were purchasers of the goods and not agents for sale, overturning the High Court's decision. Additionally, the Court found that the accounts between the parties were settled and could not be reopened due to lack of evidence of fraud, mistake, or equitable grounds. Consequently, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's judgment, and reinstated the trial court's decision in favor of the defendants, who were awarded costs in both courts. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 22 Mar 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173659