https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173650 The Supreme Court affirmed that the Madhya Pradesh Amendment Act, 2007 did not apply retrospectively to pending cases, directing such cases to remain with the Judicial Magistrate First Class. The Court ruled that the appellant, charged with offences under Sections 467, 468, and 471 of IPC, was rightly committed to the Sessions Court post-amendment. Procedural laws, including changes in trial forums, were held to apply retrospectively. The Court clarified that no vested right exists in procedural law, dismissing the appeal and applying the doctrine of prospective overruling to prevent disruption in ongoing cases. en-us Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Oct 2015 13:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173650 The Supreme Court affirmed that the Madhya Pradesh Amendment Act, 2007 did not apply retrospectively to pending cases, directing such cases to remain with the Judicial Magistrate First Class. The Court ruled that the appellant, charged with offences under Sections 467, 468, and 471 of IPC, was rightly committed to the Sessions Court post-amendment. Procedural laws, including changes in trial forums, were held to apply retrospectively. The Court clarified that no vested right exists in procedural law, dismissing the appeal and applying the doctrine of prospective overruling to prevent disruption in ongoing cases. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173650