<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 970 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173649</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellant was not entitled to exemption under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, and could not claim the status of an agent of the Central Government. The court granted the appellant time until 31.12.2013 to vacate the premises, with an undertaking to hand over peaceful and vacant possession to the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2015 19:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=398005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 970 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173649</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellant was not entitled to exemption under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, and could not claim the status of an agent of the Central Government. The court granted the appellant time until 31.12.2013 to vacate the premises, with an undertaking to hand over peaceful and vacant possession to the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>