https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173649 A party cannot claim statutory tenancy protection on a new factual basis that was neither pleaded nor proved below; a decree cannot be founded on a case outside the pleadings. The appellant's belated plea that vested tenancy rights belonged to the Central Government and that it acted only as an agent was therefore not available. On the merits, the appellant was treated as a government company, not the Government or a Government department, and statutory vesting did not convert it into the Central Government's agent. The exclusion under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act consequently applied against the appellant, and exemption from eviction protection was unavailable. en-us Mon, 05 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Oct 2015 19:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173649 A party cannot claim statutory tenancy protection on a new factual basis that was neither pleaded nor proved below; a decree cannot be founded on a case outside the pleadings. The appellant's belated plea that vested tenancy rights belonged to the Central Government and that it acted only as an agent was therefore not available. On the merits, the appellant was treated as a government company, not the Government or a Government department, and statutory vesting did not convert it into the Central Government's agent. The exclusion under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act consequently applied against the appellant, and exemption from eviction protection was unavailable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 05 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173649