<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 587 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173645</link>
    <description>The Notification dated 15.12.1993, issued under the All Indian Service Act, 1951, was deemed an amendment to the Indian Administrative Service (Fixation of Cadre Strength) Regulations, 1955. However, it was found to violate Rule 9 of the Recruitment Rules by increasing posts without corresponding adjustments, leading to its invalidation. The Tribunal held that the Notification did not align with its directions and exceeded the Central Government&#039;s authority. Consequently, the appointments of 14 officers promoted under a subsequent Notification were invalidated, with directions to adjust seniority and allotment based on the original 1987 Select List.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2015 11:22:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397998" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 587 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173645</link>
      <description>The Notification dated 15.12.1993, issued under the All Indian Service Act, 1951, was deemed an amendment to the Indian Administrative Service (Fixation of Cadre Strength) Regulations, 1955. However, it was found to violate Rule 9 of the Recruitment Rules by increasing posts without corresponding adjustments, leading to its invalidation. The Tribunal held that the Notification did not align with its directions and exceeded the Central Government&#039;s authority. Consequently, the appointments of 14 officers promoted under a subsequent Notification were invalidated, with directions to adjust seniority and allotment based on the original 1987 Select List.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173645</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>