<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 431 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173643</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to confirm duty demand and penalty against the assessee for non-compliance with central excise duty payment requirements. The court found that the assessee&#039;s failure to challenge the withdrawal of the fortnightly payment facility and adhere to the revised duty payment terms distinguished this case from previous judgments cited. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2018 09:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397994" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 431 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173643</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to confirm duty demand and penalty against the assessee for non-compliance with central excise duty payment requirements. The court found that the assessee&#039;s failure to challenge the withdrawal of the fortnightly payment facility and adhere to the revised duty payment terms distinguished this case from previous judgments cited. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173643</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>