<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 1124 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173640</link>
    <description>The special leave petition in a central excise matter was dismissed on the ground of delay, and no substantive issue was examined. The operative effect is that the petition did not proceed to merits because the delay was treated as fatal to maintainability at the threshold.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2015 15:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397991" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 1124 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173640</link>
      <description>The special leave petition in a central excise matter was dismissed on the ground of delay, and no substantive issue was examined. The operative effect is that the petition did not proceed to merits because the delay was treated as fatal to maintainability at the threshold.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>