https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellants relief in a case concerning the denial of SSI notification benefit due to brand name ownership issues. The revenue failed to provide substantial evidence establishing brand ownership by another party, leading to the decision that the appellants were entitled to the notification benefit. The lower authorities' decision was criticized for lack of thorough investigation, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief pronounced at the hearing's conclusion. en-us Fri, 07 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Jun 2016 10:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellants relief in a case concerning the denial of SSI notification benefit due to brand name ownership issues. The revenue failed to provide substantial evidence establishing brand ownership by another party, leading to the decision that the appellants were entitled to the notification benefit. The lower authorities' decision was criticized for lack of thorough investigation, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief pronounced at the hearing's conclusion. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 07 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333